Running back, UT Rio Grande Valley (from Washington State), 2022–25
Djouvensky Schlenbaker
- Number
- No. 15
- Height
- 6′0″
- Weight
- 216 lb
- Class (2025)
- Sophomore
- Hometown
- Bellingham, WA
Djouvensky Schlenbaker played running back at Washington State (2022–24) and UT Rio Grande Valley (2025).
Career highs
2rushing touchdowns, career highvs. Texas Tech, 2024Rushing
| Season | Team | Car | Yds | Avg | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Washington State | 33 | 146 | 4.4 | 0 | 20 |
| 2024 | Washington State | 43 | 149 | 3.5 | 3 | 14 |
| 2025 | UT Rio Grande Valley | 16 | 112 | 7.0 | 3 | 63 |
| Career | 92 | 407 | 4.4 | 6 | 63 | |
Season lines from CollegeFootballData, regular season and bowls.
On the roster
| Season | Team | No. | Pos | Class | Ht | Wt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Washington State | 15 | RB | Yr 1 | ||
| 2023 | Washington State | 15 | RB | Yr 2 | ||
| 2024 | Washington State | 15 | RB | Yr 3 | ||
| 2025 | UT Rio Grande Valley | 15 | RB | So. (Yr 4) | 6′0″ | 216 |
As each season’s roster listed the player (CollegeFootballData). Classes before the latest listing are counted back from it; “Yr 1” is the year on file where that count can’t place a season he played (a redshirt, transfer or 2020 year); height and weight as last listed.
Per play
| Season | Team | Plays | EPA/play | Pctile | Median | Total | Usage | Adj. rush |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Washington State | 40 | -0.01 | – | – | -0.5 | 8% | – |
| 2024 | Washington State | 46 | 0.18 | – | – | 8.1 | 7% | 0.12 |
| 2025 | UT Rio Grande Valley (FCS) | 14 | 0.41 | – | – | 5.8 | – | – |
Expected points added: how much the player’s plays moved the team’s expected score, per play and in total. Plays: total EPA divided by EPA per play, the plays the source credits to him (for a receiver roughly his catches and runs, not every target; for a passer, not every attempt), so it can differ from attempts plus carries. Percentile: against the position’s regulars that season across all divisions on file (quarterbacks with 150+ plays, backs 60+, receivers and tight ends 30+), with how many there were (n) and their median; a dash means too few plays to rank. A season in progress uses the full-season bar scaled by games played, never below 75 plays for quarterbacks, 30 for backs and 20 for receivers. The cohort grows or shrinks with the source’s coverage each season (2025 lists far more players), so compare percentiles rather than raw EPA across years. FCS seasons are marked. Usage: the share of the team’s plays the player was part of (shown from 20 plays). Adjusted pass and rush: EPA per play adjusted for the defenses faced (CollegeFootballData’s WEPA). From CollegeFootballData, 2013 on.
Game by game
2025 UT Rio Grande Valley 6 games, 112 rushing yards, 3 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Yds | TD | Long | Rec | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30 | vs.Sul Ross State | W 66–0 | 5 | 26 | 1 | 16 | – | – |
| Sep 6 | at | W 27–21 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 4 | – | – |
| Sep 13 | vs.Langston | W 80–0 | 3 | 65 | 1 | 63 | – | – |
| Sep 20 | vs.Texas Wesleyan | W 61–13 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 2 | – | – |
| Sep 27 | at | L 31–45 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 6 | – | – |
| Nov 1 | at | L 17–41 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | – | – |
2024 Washington State 11 games, 149 rushing yards, 3 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Yds | TD | Long | Rec | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31 | vs. | W 70–30 | 4 | 20 | 1 | 11 | – | – |
| Sep 7 | vs. | W 37–16 | 11 | 27 | 2 | 11 | – | – |
| Sep 14 | vs. | W 24–19 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | – | – |
| Oct 12 | at | W 25–17 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | – | – |
| Oct 19 | vs. | W 42–10 | 8 | 48 | 0 | 13 | – | – |
| Oct 26 | at | W 29–26 | 4 | 15 | 0 | 8 | – | – |
| Nov 9 | vs. | W 49–28 | 10 | 26 | 0 | 14 | – | – |
| Nov 16 | at | L 35–38 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | – | – |
| Nov 23 | at | L 38–41 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | – | – |
| Nov 30 | vs. | L 14–15 | – | – | – | – | 1 | −1 |
| Dec 27 ✦ | vs. | L 35–52 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 16 |
2023 Washington State 7 games, 146 rushing yards
| Date | Opponent | Result | Car | Yds | TD | Long | Rec | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2 | at | W 50–24 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | – | – |
| Sep 16 | vs. | W 64–21 | 4 | 41 | 0 | 20 | – | – |
| Oct 28 | at | L 27–38 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 17 |
| Nov 4 | vs. | L 7–10 | 13 | 34 | 0 | 9 | – | – |
| Nov 11 | at | L 39–42 | 9 | 42 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 15 |
| Nov 17 | vs. | W 56–14 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 7 | – | – |
| Nov 25 | at | L 21–24 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 13 | – | – |
Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.
Is this you, or do you know of something wrong or missing here? Suggest a correction. We check each one against a source before changing the page.
