Running back, Georgia Tech, 2010–⁠14

Deon Hill

Number
No. 31
Height
6′0″
Hometown
Phenix City, AL

Deon Hill played running back at Georgia Tech (2010–⁠14).

Rushing

Rushing yards, season by season, with his team’s record
SeasonTeamCarYdsAvgTDLong
2011Georgia Tech155.015
2012Georgia Tech6406.7014
2013Georgia Tech131199.2124
2014Georgia Tech342326.8318
Career543967.3524

Receiving

SeasonTeamRecYdsAvgTDLong
2012Georgia Tech4205.0110
2013Georgia Tech44912.3120
2014Georgia Tech1017817.8147
Career1824713.7347

Season lines from CollegeFootballData, regular season and bowls.

Defense before 2016

SeasonGSoloAstTkl
20118459
201211729
2013N9202
On file13720

Our box scores carry tackles, tackles for loss and sacks from 2016 only, so these come from other sources, marked by season: unmarked, cfbstats.com (Open Data Commons Attribution License), its game lines summed (G: the games he has a line in); N, NCAA statistics, via octonion/football, the season’s official lines (G: games played). A dash: the source has no number for it.

On the roster

SeasonTeamNo.PosHt
2010Georgia Tech31RB
2011Georgia Tech31RB
2012Georgia Tech31RB
2013Georgia Tech31RB
2014Georgia Tech31RB6′0″

As each season’s roster listed the player (CollegeFootballData). Classes before the latest listing are counted back from it; “Yr 1” is the year on file where that count can’t place a season he played (a redshirt, transfer or 2020 year); height and weight as last listed.

Per play

SeasonTeamPlaysEPA/playPctileMedianTotalUsage
2013Georgia Tech150.56––8.4–
2014Georgia Tech460.63––29.25%

Expected points added: how much the player’s plays moved the team’s expected score, per play and in total. Plays: total EPA divided by EPA per play, the plays the source credits to him (for a receiver roughly his catches and runs, not every target; for a passer, not every attempt), so it can differ from attempts plus carries. Percentile: against the position’s regulars that season across all divisions on file (quarterbacks with 150+ plays, backs 60+, receivers and tight ends 30+), with how many there were (n) and their median; a dash means too few plays to rank. A season in progress uses the full-season bar scaled by games played, never below 75 plays for quarterbacks, 30 for backs and 20 for receivers. The cohort grows or shrinks with the source’s coverage each season (2025 lists far more players), so compare percentiles rather than raw EPA across years. FCS seasons are marked. Usage: the share of the team’s plays the player was part of (shown from 20 plays). From CollegeFootballData, 2013 on.

Game by game

2014 Georgia Tech 12 games, 232 rushing yards, 3 TD
DateOpponentResultCarRush ydsRush TDRecRec ydsRec TD
Sep 6atTulaneW 38–⁠2164301110
Sep 13vs.Georgia SouthernW 42–⁠3841801131
Sep 20atVirginia TechW 27–⁠24–––1190
Oct 4vs.MiamiW 28–⁠172161–––
Oct 11vs.DukeL 25–⁠311503480
Oct 18atNorth CarolinaL 43–⁠4811201470
Oct 25atPittsburghW 56–⁠284171–––
Nov 1vs.VirginiaW 35–⁠102171–––
Nov 15vs.ClemsonW 28–⁠6160–––
Nov 29atGeorgiaW 30–⁠2455602130
Dec 6vs.Florida StateL 35–⁠3731901270
Dec 31 ✦vs.Mississippi StateW 49–⁠345230–––
2013 Georgia Tech 8 games, 119 rushing yards, 1 TD
DateOpponentResultCarRush ydsRush TDRecRec ydsRec TD
Aug 31vs.ElonW 70–⁠021011170
Oct 5atMiamiL 30–⁠453470–––
Oct 12atBYUL 20–⁠381110151
Oct 19vs.SyracuseW 56–⁠01230–––
Oct 26atVirginiaW 35–⁠252100–––
Nov 2vs.PittsburghW 21–⁠10130–––
Nov 14atClemsonL 31–⁠5521102270
Dec 30 ✦vs.Ole MissL 17–⁠25140–––
2012 Georgia Tech 8 games, 40 rushing yards
DateOpponentResultCarRush ydsRush TDRecRec ydsRec TD
Sep 3atVirginia TechL 17–⁠20–––291
Sep 8vs.PresbyterianW 59–⁠31120–––
Sep 15vs.VirginiaW 56–⁠20–––180
Sep 29vs.Middle TennesseeL 28–⁠49190–––
Nov 3atMarylandW 33–⁠13120–––
Nov 17vs.DukeW 42–⁠241140–––
Nov 24atGeorgiaL 10–⁠42150130
Dec 1vs.Florida StateL 15–⁠211−20–––
2011 Georgia Tech 1 game, 5 rushing yards, 1 TD
DateOpponentResultCarRush ydsRush TDRecRec ydsRec TD
Sep 1vs.Western CarolinaW 63–⁠21151–––

Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.

Is this you, or do you know of something wrong or missing here? Suggest a correction. We check each one against a source before changing the page.