D’Eriq King

Expected points added: how much the player’s plays moved the team’s expected score, per play and in total. Plays: total EPA divided by EPA per play, the plays the source credits to him (for a receiver roughly his catches and runs, not every target; for a passer, not every attempt), so it can differ from attempts plus carries. Percentile: against the position’s regulars that season across all divisions on file (quarterbacks with 150+ plays, backs 60+, receivers and tight ends 30+), with how many there were (n) and their median; a dash means too few plays to rank. A season in progress uses the full-season bar scaled by games played, never below 75 plays for quarterbacks, 30 for backs and 20 for receivers. The cohort grows or shrinks with the source’s coverage each season (2025 lists far more players), so compare percentiles rather than raw EPA across years. FCS seasons are marked. Usage: the share of the team’s plays the player was part of (shown from 20 plays). Adjusted pass and rush: EPA per play adjusted for the defenses faced (CollegeFootballData’s WEPA). From CollegeFootballData, 2013 on.

2021 Miami 3 games, 767 passing yards, 3 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Cmp	Att	Yds	TD	Int	Rush
Sep 4	vs.Alabama	L 13–⁠44	23	30	179	1	2	10
Sep 11	vs.App State	W 25–⁠23	20	33	200	0	0	79
Sep 18	vs.Michigan State	L 17–⁠38	38	59	388	2	2	7

2020 Miami 11 games, 2,686 passing yards, 23 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Cmp	Att	Yds	TD	Int	Rush
Sep 10	vs.UAB	W 31–⁠14	16	24	144	1	0	83
Sep 19	atLouisville	W 47–⁠34	18	30	325	3	0	9
Sep 26	vs.Florida State	W 52–⁠10	29	40	267	2	0	65
Oct 10	atClemson	L 17–⁠42	12	28	121	0	2	84
Oct 17	vs.Pittsburgh	W 31–⁠19	16	31	222	4	2	32
Oct 24	vs.Virginia	W 19–⁠14	21	30	322	1	0	28
Nov 6	atNC State	W 44–⁠41	31	41	430	5	0	105
Nov 14	atVirginia Tech	W 25–⁠24	24	38	255	1	0	15
Dec 5	atDuke	W 48–⁠0	16	24	248	3	0	46
Dec 12	vs.North Carolina	L 26–⁠62	18	30	239	2	1	53
Dec 29 ✦	vs.Oklahoma State	L 34–⁠37	10	13	113	1	0	18

2019 Houston 4 games, 663 passing yards, 6 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Cmp	Att	Yds	TD	Int	Rush
Sep 1	atOklahoma	L 31–⁠49	14	27	167	2	0	103
Sep 7	vs.Prairie View A&M	W 37–⁠17	15	26	139	1	1	−1
Sep 13	vs.Washington State	L 24–⁠31	13	24	128	1	0	94
Sep 19	atTulane	L 31–⁠38	16	33	229	2	1	116

2018 Houston 11 games, 2,982 passing yards, 36 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Cmp	Att	Yds	TD	Int	Rush
Sep 1	atRice	W 45–⁠27	17	24	320	3	0	33
Sep 8	vs.Arizona	W 45–⁠18	17	34	246	4	0	31
Sep 15	atTexas Tech	L 49–⁠63	30	51	431	5	0	47
Sep 22	vs.Texas Southern	W 70–⁠14	20	25	200	3	1	−4
Oct 4	vs.Tulsa	W 41–⁠26	19	27	165	3	2	117
Oct 13	atEast Carolina	W 42–⁠20	13	23	209	2	0	1
Oct 20	atNavy	W 49–⁠36	25	38	413	3	0	56
Oct 27	vs.South Florida	W 57–⁠36	28	40	419	5	2	132
Nov 3	atSMU	L 31–⁠45	11	22	175	2	0	54
Nov 10	vs.Temple	L 49–⁠59	28	46	322	5	1	125
Nov 15	vs.Tulane	W 48–⁠17	11	15	82	1	0	82

2017 Houston 10 games, 1,260 passing yards, 7 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Cmp	Att	Yds	TD	Int	Rush
Sep 23	vs.Texas Tech	L 24–⁠27	–	–	–	–	–	6
Sep 30	atTemple	W 20–⁠13	–	–	–	–	–	15
Oct 7	vs.SMU	W 35–⁠22	1	1	22	1	0	–
Oct 14	atTulsa	L 17–⁠45	–	–	–	–	–	6
Oct 19	vs.Memphis	L 38–⁠42	0	1	0	0	0	19
Oct 28	atSouth Florida	W 28–⁠24	12	20	137	1	0	83
Nov 4	vs.East Carolina	W 52–⁠27	15	21	330	3	0	14
Nov 18	atTulane	L 17–⁠20	18	26	225	0	1	141
Nov 24	vs.Navy	W 24–⁠14	21	27	277	1	0	57
Dec 24 ✦	vs.Fresno State	L 27–⁠33	23	43	269	1	1	38

2016 Houston 9 games, 16 returns, 283 yards

Date	Opponent	Result	Cmp	Att	Yds	TD	Int	Rush
Sep 3	vs.Oklahoma	W 33–⁠23	–	–	–	–	–	–
Sep 10	vs.Lamar	W 42–⁠0	1	1	5	0	0	16
Sep 15	atCincinnati	W 40–⁠16	–	–	–	–	–	20
Sep 24	atTexas State	W 64–⁠3	1	1	15	1	0	27
Sep 29	vs.UConn	W 42–⁠14	0	1	0	0	0	4
Oct 8	atNavy	L 40–⁠46	–	–	–	–	–	−5
Oct 15	vs.Tulsa	W 38–⁠31	–	–	–	–	–	1
Oct 22	atSMU	L 16–⁠38	–	–	–	–	–	–
Oct 29	vs.UCF	W 31–⁠24	–	–	–	–	–	−7

Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.

Combine or pro day: the source doesn’t say which. Unmarked: Combine and pro day results compiled by array-carpenter (nfl-draft-data); W: Pre-draft measurables: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA).

Leagues other than the NFL, from the infobox of his Wikipedia article (CC BY-SA), as it names the teams.