Receiver, Texas A&M, 2002–06
Chad Schroeder
Chad Schroeder played receiver at Texas A&M (2002–06).
Career highs
6catches, best game on filetwice; last at Oklahoma State, 2006101receiving yards, best game on filevs. The Citadel, 20062receiving touchdowns, best game on filevs. SMU, 2005Receiving
Returns
Season lines from CollegeFootballData, regular season and bowls. Every season here is summed from the game box scores (the source has no season lines for them; a game missing from the box scores is missing here). Kickoff returns are in our source’s box scores from 2009; before that most are missing, so return totals from those years may leave them out.
Game by game
2006 Texas A&M 13 games, 33 returns, 140 yards
| Date | Opponent | Result | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | PR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2 | vs. | W 35–3 | 6 | 101 | 1 | 6 |
| Sep 9 | vs. | W 51–7 | 3 | 20 | 1 | 5 |
| Sep 16 | vs. | W 28–24 | 3 | 62 | 1 | 1 |
| Sep 23 | vs. | W 45–14 | 2 | 82 | 0 | 3 |
| Sep 30 | vs. | L 27–31 | 2 | 57 | 0 | 2 |
| Oct 7 | at | W 21–18 | 5 | 49 | 0 | 2 |
| Oct 14 | vs. | W 25–19 | 3 | 28 | 0 | – |
| Oct 21 | at | W 34–33 | 6 | 52 | 0 | 2 |
| Oct 28 | at | W 31–21 | 1 | 24 | 0 | 3 |
| Nov 4 | vs. | L 16–17 | 3 | 34 | 0 | 2 |
| Nov 11 | vs. | L 27–28 | 2 | 52 | 0 | 4 |
| Nov 24 | at | W 12–7 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 2 |
| Dec 28 ✦ | vs. | L 10–45 | 2 | 36 | 1 | 1 |
2005 Texas A&M 8 games, 20 catches, 335 yards, 5 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | PR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3 | at | L 24–25 | 1 | 31 | 1 | – |
| Sep 17 | vs. | W 66–8 | 2 | 47 | 2 | – |
| Sep 22 | vs. | W 44–31 | 1 | 44 | 1 | – |
| Oct 1 | vs. | W 16–13 | 2 | 33 | 0 | – |
| Oct 8 | at | L 20–41 | 5 | 57 | 0 | – |
| Oct 15 | vs. | W 62–23 | 3 | 57 | 0 | – |
| Oct 22 | at | W 30–28 | 4 | 49 | 1 | 3 |
| Oct 29 | vs. | L 14–42 | 2 | 17 | 0 | – |
2004 Texas A&M 4 games, 4 catches, 135 yards, 2 TD
Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.
Is this you, or do you know of something wrong or missing here? Suggest a correction. We check each one against a source before changing the page.
