Tight end, Wake Forest and Old Dominion, 2017–21
Brandon Chapman
- Number
- No. 23
- Height
- 6′5″
- Weight
- 243 lb
- Class (2021)
- Senior
- Hometown
- Grove City, OH
Brandon Chapman played tight end at Wake Forest (2017–21), Old Dominion (2021), Wake Forest (2021) and Old Dominion (2021).
Career highs
2receiving touchdowns, career highvs. Rutgers, 2021Receiving
| Season | Team | Rec | Yds | Avg | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Wake Forest | 11 | 91 | 8.3 | 0 | 21 |
| 2019 | Wake Forest | 11 | 100 | 9.1 | 0 | 22 |
| 2020 | Wake Forest | 5 | 65 | 13.0 | 0 | 25 |
| 2021 | Wake Forest | 12 | 85 | 7.1 | 3 | 16 |
| Career | 39 | 341 | 8.7 | 3 | 25 | |
Season lines from CollegeFootballData, regular season and bowls.
On the roster
| Season | Team | No. | Pos | Class | Ht | Wt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Wake Forest | 23 | TE | RS | ||
| 2018 | Wake Forest | 23 | TE | Fr. | ||
| 2019 | Wake Forest | 23 | TE | So. | ||
| 2020 | Wake Forest | 23 | TE | Jr. | ||
| 2021 | Wake Forest | 23 | TE | Sr. | ||
| 2021 | Old Dominion | 23 | TE | Sr. | 6′5″ | 243 |
As each season’s roster listed the player (CollegeFootballData). Classes before the latest listing are counted back from it; “Yr 1” is the year on file where that count can’t place a season he played (a redshirt, transfer or 2020 year); height and weight as last listed.
Per play
| Season | Team | Plays | EPA/play | Pctile | Median | Total | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Wake Forest | 15 | 0.28 | – | – | 4.2 | – |
| 2019 | Wake Forest | 16 | 0.32 | – | – | 5.1 | – |
| 2020 | Wake Forest | 9 | 0.56 | – | – | 5.0 | – |
| 2021 | Wake Forest | 12 | 1.43 | – | – | 17.1 | – |
| 2021 | Old Dominion | 12 | 1.43 | – | – | 17.1 | – |
Expected points added: how much the player’s plays moved the team’s expected score, per play and in total. Plays: total EPA divided by EPA per play, the plays the source credits to him (for a receiver roughly his catches and runs, not every target; for a passer, not every attempt), so it can differ from attempts plus carries. Percentile: against the position’s regulars that season across all divisions on file (quarterbacks with 150+ plays, backs 60+, receivers and tight ends 30+), with how many there were (n) and their median; a dash means too few plays to rank. A season in progress uses the full-season bar scaled by games played, never below 75 plays for quarterbacks, 30 for backs and 20 for receivers. The cohort grows or shrinks with the source’s coverage each season (2025 lists far more players), so compare percentiles rather than raw EPA across years. FCS seasons are marked. Usage: the share of the team’s plays the player was part of (shown from 20 plays). From CollegeFootballData, 2013 on.
Game by game
2021 Wake Forest 8 games, 12 catches, 85 yards, 3 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Rec | Yds | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3 | at | L 10–42 | – | – | – | – |
| Sep 18 | vs. | W 35–14 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 8 |
| Oct 2 | vs. | W 37–34 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Oct 30 | vs. | W 45–7 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Nov 13 | vs. | W 45–42 | 3 | 23 | 1 | 11 |
| Nov 20 | at | L 27–48 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Nov 27 | at | W 41–10 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 10 |
| Dec 31 ✦ | vs. | W 38–10 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 4 |
2020 Wake Forest 4 games, 5 catches, 65 yards
| Date | Opponent | Result | Rec | Yds | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12 | vs. | L 13–37 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Oct 17 | vs. | W 40–23 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Dec 12 | at | L 21–45 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Dec 30 ✦ | vs. | L 28–42 | 2 | 40 | 0 | 25 |
2019 Wake Forest 8 games, 11 catches, 100 yards
| Date | Opponent | Result | Rec | Yds | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30 | vs. | W 38–35 | 3 | 24 | 0 | 19 |
| Sep 21 | vs. | W 49–7 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sep 28 | at | W 27–24 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Oct 19 | vs. | W 22–20 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 5 |
| Nov 2 | vs. | W 44–10 | 1 | 22 | 0 | 22 |
| Nov 9 | at | L 17–36 | – | – | – | – |
| Nov 30 | at | L 30–39 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 11 |
| Dec 27 ✦ | vs. | L 21–27 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
2018 Wake Forest 7 games, 11 catches, 91 yards
| Date | Opponent | Result | Rec | Yds | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13 | vs. | L 34–41 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sep 22 | vs. | L 27–56 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 5 |
| Sep 29 | vs. | W 56–24 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Oct 20 | at | L 17–38 | 2 | 22 | 0 | 14 |
| Nov 8 | at | W 27–23 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Nov 17 | vs. | L 13–34 | 3 | 36 | 0 | 21 |
| Dec 22 ✦ | vs. | W 37–34 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.
Is this you, or do you know of something wrong or missing here? Suggest a correction. We check each one against a source before changing the page.
