Punter, Georgia Tech, to 2005
Ben Arndt
Ben Arndt played punter at Georgia Tech (to 2005).
Punting
| Season | Team | Punts | Yds | Avg | Long | In 20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | Georgia Tech | 71 | 2,755 | 38.8 | 64 | 0 |
| 2005 | Georgia Tech | 87 | 3,433 | 39.5 | 78 | 0 |
| On file (2004–05) | 158 | 6,188 | 39.2 | 78 | 0 | |
Season lines from CollegeFootballData, regular season and bowls. Every season here is summed from the game box scores (the source has no season lines for them; a game missing from the box scores is missing here).
Game by game
2005 Georgia Tech 12 games, 87 punts, 39.5 average
| Date | Opponent | Result | Punts | Yds | Long | In 20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3 | at | W 23–14 | 5 | 208 | 55 | 0 |
| Sep 10 | vs. | W 27–21 | 7 | 332 | 55 | 0 |
| Sep 17 | vs. | W 28–13 | 7 | 305 | 52 | 0 |
| Sep 24 | at | L 7–51 | 11 | 464 | 55 | 0 |
| Oct 6 | vs. | L 14–17 | 7 | 273 | 51 | 0 |
| Oct 15 | at | W 35–10 | 6 | 243 | 51 | 0 |
| Oct 29 | vs. | W 10–9 | 7 | 259 | 46 | 0 |
| Nov 5 | vs. | W 30–17 | 6 | 191 | 50 | 0 |
| Nov 12 | at | L 17–27 | 5 | 180 | 38 | 0 |
| Nov 19 | at | W 14–10 | 9 | 363 | 78 | 0 |
| Nov 26 | vs. | L 7–14 | 9 | 349 | 49 | 0 |
| Dec 29 ✦ | vs. | L 10–38 | 8 | 266 | 44 | 0 |
2004 Georgia Tech 12 games, 71 punts, 38.8 average
| Date | Opponent | Result | Punts | Yds | Long | In 20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4 | vs. | W 28–7 | 4 | 159 | 48 | 0 |
| Sep 11 | at | W 28–24 | 10 | 420 | 54 | 0 |
| Sep 18 | at | L 13–34 | 5 | 200 | 50 | 0 |
| Oct 2 | vs. | L 3–27 | 8 | 306 | 64 | 0 |
| Oct 9 | at | W 20–7 | 8 | 268 | 46 | 0 |
| Oct 16 | vs. | W 24–7 | 5 | 181 | 47 | 0 |
| Oct 28 | vs. | L 20–34 | 6 | 275 | 54 | 0 |
| Nov 6 | at | W 24–14 | 8 | 306 | 55 | 0 |
| Nov 13 | vs. | W 30–10 | 3 | 136 | 50 | 0 |
| Nov 20 | vs. | L 10–30 | 6 | 226 | 41 | 0 |
| Nov 27 | at | L 13–19 | 6 | 207 | 41 | 0 |
| Dec 21 ✦ | vs. | W 51–14 | 2 | 71 | 39 | 0 |
Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.
Is this you, or do you know of something wrong or missing here? Suggest a correction. We check each one against a source before changing the page.
