Anthony Wilkerson

Expected points added: how much the player’s plays moved the team’s expected score, per play and in total. Plays: total EPA divided by EPA per play, the plays the source credits to him (for a receiver roughly his catches and runs, not every target; for a passer, not every attempt), so it can differ from attempts plus carries. Percentile: against the position’s regulars that season across all divisions on file (quarterbacks with 150+ plays, backs 60+, receivers and tight ends 30+), with how many there were (n) and their median; a dash means too few plays to rank. A season in progress uses the full-season bar scaled by games played, never below 75 plays for quarterbacks, 30 for backs and 20 for receivers. The cohort grows or shrinks with the source’s coverage each season (2025 lists far more players), so compare percentiles rather than raw EPA across years. FCS seasons are marked. Usage: the share of the team’s plays the player was part of (shown from 20 plays). Adjusted pass and rush: EPA per play adjusted for the defenses faced (CollegeFootballData’s WEPA). From CollegeFootballData, 2013 on.

2013 Stanford 13 games, 353 rushing yards, 2 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Car	Yds	TD	Long	Rec	Rec yds
Sep 7	vs.San José State	W 34–⁠13	9	65	0	27	2	14
Sep 14	atArmy	W 34–⁠20	4	11	0	5	–	–
Sep 21	vs.Arizona State	W 42–⁠28	18	68	1	18	2	18
Sep 28	atWashington State	W 55–⁠17	10	47	0	19	–	–
Oct 5	vs.Washington	W 31–⁠28	6	23	0	8	1	6
Oct 12	atUtah	L 21–⁠27	2	2	0	1	–	–
Oct 19	vs.UCLA	W 24–⁠10	4	−9	0	4	–	–
Nov 7	vs.Oregon	W 26–⁠20	6	25	0	10	–	–
Nov 16	atUSC	L 17–⁠20	3	9	0	11	–	–
Nov 23	vs.California	W 63–⁠13	7	21	0	8	–	–
Nov 30	vs.Notre Dame	W 27–⁠20	5	34	1	20	–	–
Dec 7	vs.Arizona State	W 38–⁠14	10	57	0	29	–	–
Jan 1 ✦	vs.Michigan State	L 20–⁠24	–	–	–	–	1	7

2012 Stanford 11 games, 224 rushing yards, 1 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Car	Yds	TD	Long	Rec	Rec yds
Aug 31	vs.San José State	W 20–⁠17	6	24	0	11	–	–
Sep 8	vs.Duke	W 50–⁠13	1	8	0	8	–	–
Sep 15	vs.USC	W 21–⁠14	2	9	0	5	–	–
Oct 13	atNotre Dame	L 13–⁠20	3	12	0	5	–	–
Oct 20	atCalifornia	W 21–⁠3	6	22	0	9	–	–
Oct 27	vs.Washington State	W 24–⁠17	1	17	0	17	–	–
Nov 3	atColorado	W 48–⁠0	7	35	0	16	–	–
Nov 10	vs.Oregon State	W 27–⁠23	4	13	0	7	–	–
Nov 24	atUCLA	W 35–⁠17	13	48	1	10	–	–
Nov 30	vs.UCLA	W 27–⁠24	2	5	0	3	–	–
Jan 1 ✦	vs.Wisconsin	W 20–⁠14	5	31	0	19	1	−1

2011 Stanford 12 games, 282 rushing yards, 3 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Car	Yds	TD	Long	Rec	Rec yds
Sep 3	vs.San José State	W 57–⁠3	8	14	0	7	–	–
Sep 10	atDuke	W 44–⁠14	2	6	0	5	–	–
Sep 17	atArizona	W 37–⁠10	2	28	1	24	–	–
Oct 1	vs.UCLA	W 45–⁠19	7	26	0	12	–	–
Oct 8	vs.Colorado	W 48–⁠7	3	21	0	10	1	3
Oct 15	atWashington State	W 44–⁠14	6	25	0	11	–	–
Oct 22	vs.Washington	W 65–⁠21	14	93	2	38	–	–
Oct 29	atUSC	W 56–⁠48	1	3	0	3	1	3
Nov 5	atOregon State	W 38–⁠13	7	37	0	14	–	–
Nov 19	vs.California	W 31–⁠28	2	22	0	21	–	–
Nov 26	vs.Notre Dame	W 28–⁠14	3	8	0	11	–	–
Jan 2 ✦	vs.Oklahoma State	L 38–⁠41	1	−1	0	0	–	–

2010 Stanford 13 games, 408 rushing yards, 3 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Car	Yds	TD	Long	Rec	Rec yds
Sep 4	vs.Sacramento State	W 52–⁠17	7	27	1	9	–	–
Sep 11	atUCLA	W 35–⁠0	3	12	0	8	–	–
Sep 18	vs.Wake Forest	W 68–⁠24	6	16	0	6	–	–
Sep 25	atNotre Dame	W 37–⁠14	1	0	0	0	–	–
Oct 2	atOregon	L 31–⁠52	2	13	0	11	–	–
Oct 9	vs.USC	W 37–⁠35	3	15	1	7	1	25
Oct 23	vs.Washington State	W 38–⁠28	9	55	0	20	–	–
Oct 30	atWashington	W 41–⁠0	5	29	0	22	–	–
Nov 6	vs.Arizona	W 42–⁠17	10	81	0	39	–	–
Nov 13	atArizona State	W 17–⁠13	10	65	0	19	1	−1
Nov 20	atCalifornia	W 48–⁠14	18	67	1	14	–	–
Nov 27	vs.Oregon State	W 38–⁠0	13	29	0	6	1	23
Jan 3 ✦	vs.Virginia Tech	W 40–⁠12	2	−1	0	1	–	–

Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.