Andrew Gantz

Expected points added: how much the player’s plays moved the team’s expected score, per play and in total. Plays: total EPA divided by EPA per play, the plays the source credits to him (for a receiver roughly his catches and runs, not every target; for a passer, not every attempt), so it can differ from attempts plus carries. Percentile: against the position’s regulars that season across all divisions on file (quarterbacks with 150+ plays, backs 60+, receivers and tight ends 30+), with how many there were (n) and their median; a dash means too few plays to rank. A season in progress uses the full-season bar scaled by games played, never below 75 plays for quarterbacks, 30 for backs and 20 for receivers. The cohort grows or shrinks with the source’s coverage each season (2025 lists far more players), so compare percentiles rather than raw EPA across years. FCS seasons are marked. Usage: the share of the team’s plays the player was part of (shown from 20 plays). PAAR: points a kicker added above a replacement-level kicker, with his field-goal attempts. From CollegeFootballData, 2013 on.

2018 Northern Illinois 13 games, 10 of 15 field goals

Date	Opponent	Result	FGM	FGA	Long	XP	Pts
Sep 1	atIowa	L 7–⁠33	0	2	0	1	1
Sep 8	vs.Utah	L 6–⁠17	2	2	49	0	6
Sep 15	vs.Central Michigan	W 24–⁠16	1	1	36	3	6
Sep 22	atFlorida State	L 19–⁠37	0	1	0	1	1
Sep 29	atEastern Michigan	W 26–⁠23	2	2	43	2	8
Oct 6	atBall State	W 24–⁠16	1	1	27	3	6
Oct 13	vs.Ohio	W 24–⁠21	1	1	36	1	4
Oct 27	atBYU	W 7–⁠6	0	1	0	1	1
Nov 1	atAkron	W 36–⁠26	2	3	40	4	10
Nov 7	vs.Toledo	W 38–⁠15	1	1	49	5	8
Nov 14	vs.Miami (OH)	L 7–⁠13	0	0	0	1	1
Nov 20	atWestern Michigan	L 21–⁠28	0	0	0	3	3
Nov 30	vs.Buffalo	W 30–⁠29	–	–	39	3	6

2017 Cincinnati 1 game, 0 of 1 field goal

Date	Opponent	Result	FGM	FGA	Long	XP	Pts
Aug 31	vs.Austin Peay	W 26–⁠14	0	1	0	2	2

2016 Cincinnati 2 games, 2 of 2 field goals

Date	Opponent	Result	FGM	FGA	Long	XP	Pts
Sep 10	atPurdue	W 38–⁠20	1	1	26	5	8
Sep 15	vs.Houston	L 16–⁠40	1	1	37	1	4

2015 Cincinnati 13 games, 21 of 27 field goals

Date	Opponent	Result	FGM	FGA	Long	XP	Pts
Sep 5	vs.Alabama A&M	W 52–⁠10	1	1	35	7	10
Sep 12	vs.Temple	L 26–⁠34	2	3	27	2	8
Sep 19	atMiami (OH)	W 37–⁠33	3	3	46	4	13
Sep 24	atMemphis	L 46–⁠53	4	5	49	4	16
Oct 1	vs.Miami	W 34–⁠23	2	2	51	4	10
Oct 16	atBYU	L 24–⁠38	1	2	29	3	6
Oct 24	vs.UConn	W 37–⁠13	3	4	38	4	13
Oct 31	vs.UCF	W 52–⁠7	1	1	26	7	10
Nov 7	atHouston	L 30–⁠33	0	0	0	2	2
Nov 14	vs.Tulsa	W 49–⁠38	0	1	0	7	7
Nov 20	atSouth Florida	L 27–⁠65	2	2	44	3	9
Nov 28	atEast Carolina	W 19–⁠16	2	3	50	1	7
Dec 24 ✦	vs.San Diego State	L 7–⁠42	0	0	0	1	1

2014 Cincinnati 13 games, 16 of 20 field goals

Date	Opponent	Result	FGM	FGA	Long	XP	Pts
Sep 12	vs.Toledo	W 58–⁠34	1	1	34	7	10
Sep 20	vs.Miami (OH)	W 31–⁠24	1	1	21	4	7
Sep 27	atOhio State	L 28–⁠50	0	0	0	4	4
Oct 4	vs.Memphis	L 14–⁠41	0	1	0	2	2
Oct 11	atMiami	L 34–⁠55	2	2	46	4	10
Oct 18	atSMU	W 41–⁠3	3	3	40	2	11
Oct 24	vs.South Florida	W 34–⁠17	2	2	23	4	10
Oct 31	atTulane	W 38–⁠14	1	1	30	5	8
Nov 13	vs.East Carolina	W 54–⁠46	2	2	47	6	12
Nov 22	atUConn	W 41–⁠0	2	3	44	5	11
Nov 29	atTemple	W 14–⁠6	0	0	0	2	2
Dec 6	vs.Houston	W 38–⁠31	1	2	40	5	8
Dec 27 ✦	vs.Virginia Tech	L 17–⁠33	1	2	25	2	5

Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.

Combine and pro day results compiled by array-carpenter (nfl-draft-data).