Luke Schomburg

Expected points added: how much the player’s plays moved the team’s expected score, per play and in total. Plays: total EPA divided by EPA per play, the plays the source credits to him (for a receiver roughly his catches and runs, not every target; for a passer, not every attempt), so it can differ from attempts plus carries. Percentile: against the position’s regulars that season across all divisions on file (quarterbacks with 150+ plays, backs 60+, receivers and tight ends 30+), with how many there were (n) and their median; a dash means too few plays to rank. A season in progress uses the full-season bar scaled by games played, never below 75 plays for quarterbacks, 30 for backs and 20 for receivers. The cohort grows or shrinks with the source’s coverage each season (2025 lists far more players), so compare percentiles rather than raw EPA across years. FCS seasons are marked. Usage: the share of the team’s plays the player was part of (shown from 20 plays). From CollegeFootballData, 2013 on.

2024 Chattanooga 6 games, 663 passing yards, 4 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Cmp	Att	Yds	TD	Int	Rush
Aug 31	atTennessee	L 3–⁠69	1	1	12	0	0	–
Oct 12	atFurman	W 41–⁠10	1	1	12	0	0	18
Nov 2	atWestern Carolina	L 34–⁠38	14	31	314	2	3	−9
Nov 9	atThe Citadel	W 31–⁠7	8	15	131	2	0	−16
Nov 16	vs.Samford	L 13–⁠36	18	35	148	0	1	−23
Nov 23	atAustin Peay	W 24–⁠17	7	9	46	0	1	23

2023 Chattanooga 6 games, 517 passing yards, 2 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Cmp	Att	Yds	TD	Int	Rush
Sep 16	vs.The Citadel	W 48–⁠3	1	1	57	1	0	−15
Oct 14	atMercer	W 22–⁠10	–	–	–	–	–	–
Oct 21	vs.East Tennessee State	W 34–⁠3	2	5	10	0	0	–
Nov 18	atAlabama	L 10–⁠66	10	21	107	0	1	–
Nov 25 ✦	atAustin Peay	W 24–⁠21	21	36	259	1	1	0
Dec 2 ✦	atFurman	L 7–⁠26	9	19	84	0	1	−2

Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.