Quarterback, Eastern Michigan (from Michigan State, Coastal Carolina), 2020–26
Noah Kim
Lettered 2022–23 at Michigan State (school media guide)
- Number
- No. 1
- Height
- 6′2″
- Weight
- 186 lb
- Class (2026)
- Senior
- Hometown
- Centreville, VA
Noah Kim plays quarterback for Eastern Michigan, after Michigan State (2020–23) and Coastal Carolina (2024). Last time out, against Toledo: 16 of 36, 214 yards, 2 TD. Kim leads Eastern Michigan in passing touchdowns and passing yards this season.
2026 so far
1,678 passing yards, 11 TD
Last game: 16 of 36, 214 yards, 2 TD vs. Toledo, L 14–34
Next game: at Ohio, Oct 24
Filled bars: wins; outlined: losses.
Career highs
330passing yards, career highat Kentucky, 20254touchdown passes, career highat Miami (OH), 2025Passing
* The season in progress, so far.
| Season | Team | Cmp | Att | Pct | Yds | Y/A | TD | Int |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Michigan State | 14 | 19 | 73.7 | 174 | 9.2 | 3 | 0 |
| 2023 | Michigan State | 91 | 160 | 56.9 | 1,090 | 6.8 | 6 | 6 |
| 2024 | Coastal Carolina | 30 | 56 | 53.6 | 333 | 5.9 | 4 | 1 |
| 2025 | Eastern Michigan | 247 | 402 | 61.4 | 2,817 | 7.0 | 18 | 11 |
| 2026 | Eastern Michigan | 169 | 285 | 59.3 | 1,678 | 5.9 | 11 | 4 |
| Career | 551 | 922 | 59.8 | 6,092 | 6.6 | 42 | 22 | |
Rushing
| Season | Team | Car | Yds | Avg | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Michigan State | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 | 5 |
| 2023 | Michigan State | 27 | 53 | 2.0 | 0 | 14 |
| 2024 | Coastal Carolina | 13 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 7 |
| 2025 | Eastern Michigan | 79 | 186 | 2.4 | 6 | 20 |
| 2026 | Eastern Michigan | 29 | −23 | −0.8 | 3 | 11 |
| Career | 149 | 221 | 1.5 | 9 | 20 | |
Season lines from CollegeFootballData, regular season and bowls.
On the roster
| Season | Team | No. | Pos | Class | Ht | Wt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Michigan State | 1 | QB | Yr 1 | ||
| 2021 | Michigan State | 1 | QB | Yr 2 | ||
| 2022 | Michigan State | 1 | QB | Yr 3 | ||
| 2023 | Michigan State | 1 | QB | Yr 4 | ||
| 2024 | Coastal Carolina | 1 | QB | Yr 5 | ||
| 2025 | Eastern Michigan | 1 | QB | Yr 6 | ||
| 2026 | Eastern Michigan | 1 | QB | Sr. (Yr 7) | 6′2″ | 186 |
As each season’s roster listed the player (CollegeFootballData). Classes before the latest listing are counted back from it; “Yr 1” is the year on file where that count can’t place a season he played (a redshirt, transfer or 2020 year); height and weight as last listed.
Per play
| Season | Team | Plays | EPA/play | Pctile | Median | Total | Usage | Adj. pass | Adj. rush |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Michigan State | 21 | 0.83 | – | – | 17.5 | 12% | – | – |
| 2023 | Michigan State | 178 | 0.27 | 34th (n=255) | 0.32 | 47.2 | 53% | 0.31 | – |
| 2024 | Coastal Carolina | 68 | 0.18 | – | – | 12.6 | 16% | 0.21 | – |
| 2025 | Eastern Michigan | 493 | 0.27 | 60th (n=314) | 0.24 | 133.1 | 60% | 0.29 | 0.24 |
| 2026 | Eastern Michigan | 311 | 0.14 | 33rd (n=273) | 0.21 | 44.8 | 57% | 0.17 | – |
Expected points added: how much the player’s plays moved the team’s expected score, per play and in total. Plays: total EPA divided by EPA per play, the plays the source credits to him (for a receiver roughly his catches and runs, not every target; for a passer, not every attempt), so it can differ from attempts plus carries. Percentile: against the position’s regulars that season across all divisions on file (quarterbacks with 150+ plays, backs 60+, receivers and tight ends 30+), with how many there were (n) and their median; a dash means too few plays to rank. A season in progress uses the full-season bar scaled by games played, never below 75 plays for quarterbacks, 30 for backs and 20 for receivers. The cohort grows or shrinks with the source’s coverage each season (2025 lists far more players), so compare percentiles rather than raw EPA across years. FCS seasons are marked. Usage: the share of the team’s plays the player was part of (shown from 20 plays). Adjusted pass and rush: EPA per play adjusted for the defenses faced (CollegeFootballData’s WEPA). From CollegeFootballData, 2013 on.
Passing detail
| Season | Team | Success | Depth | After catch | Deep throws | Deep completed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Eastern Michigan | 42% | 8.7 yds | 5.0 yds | 13 of 131 | 46% |
| 2026 | Eastern Michigan | 40% | 7.8 yds | 5.4 yds | 36 of 281 | 19% |
Success: passes that kept the offense on schedule. Depth: how far downfield his passes traveled in the air, on average. After catch: yards his receivers gained after the catch, per completion. Deep throws: the play-by-play gives depth and direction for about half of a passer’s throws; this is how many of those went deep, and how many of the deep ones were caught. From CollegeFootballData, FBS games, 2025 on.
Rushing detail
| Season | Team | Success | Line yards | Second level | Open field | Stuffed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Eastern Michigan | 40% | 3.30 | 1.00 | 0.30 | 13% |
| 2026 | Eastern Michigan | 35% | 2.20 | 0.80 | 0.10 | 20% |
Where his yards came from, per carry: line yards are the ones credited to the blockers (the first few, and losses), second level the yards 5 to 10 past the line, open field those beyond 10. Success: carries that kept the offense on schedule. Stuffed: carries stopped at or behind the line. From CollegeFootballData, FBS games, 2025 on.
Game by game
2026 Eastern Michigan 8 games, 1,678 passing yards, 11 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Cmp | Att | Yds | TD | Int | Rush |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29 | vs. | W 28–17 | 27 | 38 | 279 | 2 | 0 | −13 |
| Sep 4 | vs. | L 21–27 | 24 | 43 | 174 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| Sep 12 | at | L 7–35 | 16 | 26 | 118 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Sep 19 | at | L 10–54 | 16 | 28 | 140 | 1 | 2 | −16 |
| Sep 26 | vs. | W 29–3 | 23 | 38 | 257 | 2 | 0 | −3 |
| Oct 3 | at | W 38–14 | 21 | 30 | 219 | 2 | 0 | 16 |
| Oct 10 | at | W 25–23 | 26 | 46 | 277 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Oct 17 | vs. | L 14–34 | 16 | 36 | 214 | 2 | 0 | −20 |
2025 Eastern Michigan 12 games, 2,817 passing yards, 18 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Cmp | Att | Yds | TD | Int | Rush |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30 | at | L 27–52 | 23 | 34 | 248 | 1 | 0 | −14 |
| Sep 6 | vs. | L 23–28 | 18 | 29 | 189 | 2 | 0 | 38 |
| Sep 13 | at | L 23–48 | 25 | 42 | 330 | 1 | 1 | 19 |
| Sep 20 | vs. | W 34–31 | 21 | 31 | 226 | 1 | 1 | 12 |
| Sep 27 | at | L 13–24 | 17 | 28 | 175 | 0 | 1 | 18 |
| Oct 4 | at | L 30–31 | 19 | 31 | 168 | 2 | 0 | 10 |
| Oct 11 | vs. | W 16–10 | 19 | 32 | 147 | 1 | 1 | 32 |
| Oct 18 | at | L 30–44 | 20 | 36 | 309 | 4 | 2 | −2 |
| Oct 25 | vs. | L 21–28 | 21 | 30 | 259 | 2 | 0 | 30 |
| Nov 8 | vs. | W 27–21 | 22 | 39 | 210 | 1 | 0 | 28 |
| Nov 15 | at | W 24–9 | 18 | 29 | 229 | 1 | 2 | 21 |
| Nov 25 | vs. | L 21–31 | 24 | 41 | 327 | 2 | 3 | −6 |
2024 Coastal Carolina 7 games, 333 passing yards, 4 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Cmp | Att | Yds | TD | Int | Rush |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29 | at | W 55–27 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Sep 7 | vs. | W 40–21 | 2 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 0 | – |
| Sep 21 | vs. | L 24–43 | 6 | 12 | 80 | 1 | 0 | – |
| Oct 10 | at | L 7–39 | 4 | 7 | 18 | 0 | 0 | −9 |
| Oct 19 | vs. | L 24–34 | 16 | 25 | 182 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Nov 23 | vs. | L 6–26 | 1 | 7 | 25 | 0 | 1 | −3 |
| Nov 30 | at | W 48–27 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – |
2023 Michigan State 5 games, 1,090 passing yards, 6 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Cmp | Att | Yds | TD | Int | Rush |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1 | vs. | W 31–7 | 18 | 31 | 279 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 9 | vs. | W 45–14 | 18 | 22 | 292 | 3 | 0 | 21 |
| Sep 16 | vs. | L 7–41 | 12 | 31 | 136 | 0 | 1 | −9 |
| Sep 23 | vs. | L 9–31 | 18 | 32 | 190 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Sep 30 | at | L 16–26 | 25 | 44 | 193 | 0 | 3 | 35 |
2022 Michigan State 3 games, 174 passing yards, 3 TD
| Date | Opponent | Result | Cmp | Att | Yds | TD | Int | Rush |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10 | vs. | W 52–0 | 2 | 2 | 22 | 1 | 0 | – |
| Sep 24 | vs. | L 7–34 | 6 | 7 | 70 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Oct 8 | vs. | L 20–49 | 6 | 10 | 82 | 1 | 0 | – |
Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.
Is this you, or do you know of something wrong or missing here? Suggest a correction. We check each one against a source before changing the page.
